loading page

A bibliometric analysis of personal protective equipment and COVID-19 researches
  • +8
  • Yu Zhang,
  • Man Hu,
  • Junwu Wang,
  • Pingchuan Wang ,
  • Pengzhi Shi,
  • Wenjie Zhao,
  • Xin Liu,
  • Qing Peng,
  • Xinmin Feng,
  • Yongxiang Wang,
  • Liang Zhang
Yu Zhang
Yangzhou University Medical college
Author Profile
Man Hu
Dalian Medical College
Author Profile
Junwu Wang
Yangzhou University Medical college
Author Profile
Pingchuan Wang
Yangzhou University Medical college
Author Profile
Pengzhi Shi
Dalian Medical College
Author Profile
Wenjie Zhao
Dalian Medical College
Author Profile
Xin Liu
Yangzhou University Medical college
Author Profile
Qing Peng
Yangzhou University Medical college
Author Profile
Xinmin Feng
Yangzhou University Medical college
Author Profile
Yongxiang Wang
Yangzhou University Medical college
Author Profile
Liang Zhang
Yangzhou University Medical college

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Background: COVID-19, which occurred at the end of December 2019, has evolved into a global public health threat. COVID-19’s high infectivity and mortality prompt governments and scientific community to respond quickly to the outbreak of the pandemic. The application of personal protective equipment (PPE) is of great significance in overcoming the epidemic situation. Although there were many studies about PPE and COVID-19, there is no study about bibliometric analysis of these studies. This study aims to provide a general overview of studies on PPE and COVID-19. Methods: On October 07, 2021, the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database was used to identify documents on PPE and COVID-19. HistCite and VOSviewer softwares were used for citation analysis and visualization mapping. Results: A total of 1462 documents authored by 6993 authors and published in 750 journals were included in the final analysis. The most prolific author was Macintyre CR. The USA was the most productive country with 463 published documents. The leading journal was Plos One. Network visualization map showed that USA was the largest international collaboration network. The keyword “COVID-19” had the strongest total link strengths (TLS) and largest number of occurrences. The New England Journal of Medicine was the leading source with highest TLS. The University of Toronto had the highest number of links and the highest TLS. Conclusions: The bibliometric analysis of PPE and COVID-19 provides an overall perspective, and the appreciation and study of these influential publications are very useful for future research.