Limitations and strengths
The present study suffers from biases typical of an observational study,
although these would be non-differential biases whereby all patients
would be equally affected, regardless of the subgroup they belong to. As
such, the estimated associations would tend towards a null value (no
association). Furthermore, we have not taken into account variables such
as the association with autoimmune diseases or any family history of the
disease, which are now considered as variables defining possible
subtypes of MD.
Conversely, we provide data from a longitudinal study carried out on a
large number of patients with a long follow-up. Moreover, we have
performed an analysis of variables related to MD and their outcomes in
different subgroups. To date, no study has yet attempted to explain the
existence of different evolutionary models of the disease in this sense
and hence, we believe that our study may offer a new perspective to
define the existence of different subtypes of uMD.
5.CONCLUSIONS
In most of the uMD patients, after the first four years of disease
follow-up, there is a reduction and a stabilization in the mean number
of annual episodes of vertigo. An in depth analysis of the number of
episodes of vertigo over the first 10 years of disease evolution has
enabled us to define 3 clinical models based on the evolution of the
episodes of vertigo suffered in the first 10 years of the disease.
Patients included in model number one showed significantly less hearing
loss at the end of follow-up. The patients included in model three had a
worse disease prognosis in terms of the number of vertigo episodes,
number of Tumarkin crises, a greater need for surgical intervention and
a mono-symptomatic onset.
The data presented here offer criteria that may help to predict the
evolution of MD in different subsets of patients, enabling their
treatment to be better personalized, while encouraging a close follow up
of the episodes of vertigo in UMD patients.
8. REFERENCES
1. Perez-Garrigues H, Lopez-Escamez JA, Perez P, Sanz R, Orts M, Marco
J, et al. Time course of episodes of definitive vertigo in Meniere’s
disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Nov 17;134(11):1149–54.
2. Tokumasu K, Fujino A, Yoshio S, Hoshino I. Prognosis of Meniere’s
disease by conservative treatment: retrospective study on the time
course of the disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1995;519(March):216–8.
3. Tokumasu K, Fujino A, Naganuma H, Hoshino I, Arai M. Initial symptoms
and retrospective evaluation of prognosis in Menière’s disease. Acta
Otolaryngol Suppl. 1996;524:43–9.
4. Havia M, Kentala E. Progression of Symptoms of Dizziness in Ménière’s
Disease. Head Neck. 2004;130(Md):431–5.
5. Friberg U, Stahle J, Svedberg A. The natural course of Meniere’s
disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1984;406:72–7.
6. Montes-Jovellar L, Guillen-Grima F, Perez-Fernandez N. Cluster
analysis of auditory and vestibular test results in definite meniere’s
disease. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1810–7.
7. Frejo L, Martin-Sanz E, Teggi R, Trinidad G, Soto-Varela A,
Santos-Perez S, et al. Extended phenotype and clinical subgroups in
unilateral Meniere disease: A cross-sectional study with cluster
analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;(January):1–9.
8. Frejo L, Soto-Varela A, Santos-Perez S, Aran I, Batuecas-Caletrio A,
Perez-Guillen V, et al. Clinical subgroups in bilateral meniere disease.
Front Neurol. 2016;7(OCT):1–10.
9. Swaminathan A, Smith JH. Migraine and Vertigo. Curr Neurol Neurosci
Rep. 2015;15(2).
10. Clemmens C, Ruckenstein M. Characteristics of Patients With
Unilateral and Bilateral Ménière’s Disease. Otol Neurotol. 2012
Sep;33(7):1266–9.
11. Ray J, Carr SD, Popli G, Gibson WP. An epidemiological study to
investigate the relationship between Meniere’s disease and migraine.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016;41(6):707–10.
12. Ghavami Y, Mahboubi H, Yau AY, Maducdoc M, Djalilian HR. Migraine
features in patients with Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope.
2016;126(1):163–8.
13. Baloh RW, Jacobson K, Winder T. Drop attacks with Meniere’s
syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;28(3):384–7.
14. Black FO, Effron MZ, Burns DS. Diagnosis and Management of Drop
Attacks of Vestibular Origin: Tumarkin’s Otolithic Crisis. Otolaryngol
Neck Surg. 1982 Mar;90(2):256–62.
15. Viana LM, Bahmad F, Rauch SD. Intratympanic gentamicin as a
treatment for drop attacks in patients with Meniere’s disease.
Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2151–4.
16. Gürkov R, Jerin C, Flatz W, Maxwell R. Clinical manifestations of
hydropic ear disease (Menière’s). Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2018
Oct 10;
17. Kitahara T. Evidence of surgical treatments for intractable
Meniere’s disease. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(3):393–8.
18. Havia M, Kentala E, Pyykkö I. Hearing loss and tinnitus in Meniere’s
disease. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2002 Apr;29(2):115–9.
19. Pyykkö I, Nakashima T, Yoshida T, Zou J, Naganawa S. Ménière’s
disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and
the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open. 2013 Feb
14;3(2):e001555.
20. Belinchon A, Perez-Garrigues H, Tenias JM. Evolution of symptoms in
Ménière’s disease. Audiol Neurotol. 2012;17(2):126–32.
21. Katsarkas A. Hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction in Menière’s
disease. Acta Otolaryngol. 1996 Mar;116(2):185–8.
22. Thomas K, Harrison S. long-therm follow upof 610 cases of ménière’s
disease. Proc R Soc Med. 1971;64(8):856–7.
9. FIGURE CAPTIONS
Fig 1. Average incidence according to year of follow-up of the
disease in UMD patients.
Fig 2. Average incidence according to five-year follow-up of
the disease in UMD patients.
Fig 3. Course of disease for each subtype expressed in the mean
annual number of vertigo episodes suffered in the first ten years.